Rewriting the passage for enhanced engagement:

Renowned for her chart-topping anthems and unwavering stance on social issues, Swift eagerly embraced the festival’s theme of ‘Unwoke’ music. “This festival serves as a sanctuary where artists can unfurl their creativity without the shadow of censorship or cancel culture,” she declared in a recent interview, her eyes gleaming with anticipation.

Hanks, celebrated for his chameleon-like performances on screen, echoed Swift’s sentiments, underlining the vitality of cherishing a spectrum of viewpoints and expressions.

In a groundbreaking study by Whitman Insight Strategies and MRC, the influential power of US celebrities in mobilizing voters has been unveiled.

Leading the charge are none other than the incomparable Taylor Swift and the esteemed Tom Hanks. They stand tall alongside luminaries such as Cardi B, Beyoncé, LeBron James, and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson.

Surveying over a thousand likely voters, the study delved into the impact of celebrity endorsements on the impending elections. The resounding response? Celebrities wield considerable influence in shaping voter opinions.

A staggering 12% of voters confessed to being swayed by a celebrity’s endorsement. Among them, 28% hailed from the Black community, while 17% were proud Millennials.

Tom Hanks emerges as the paragon of trust in political endorsements, capturing the faith of 49% of voters. Close on his heels is Dwayne Johnson, commanding the allegiance of 45%. Not to be outdone, Taylor Swift sways a notable 13% of the 36% who’ve already cast their votes.

In the unfolding drama of politics, these celebrities don’t just perform on stage or screen; they orchestrate change, amplifying voices and inspiring action in the hearts of millions.

Tom Hanks has joined the chorus of voices addressing diversity and representation issues in Hollywood. In a recent interview with The New York Times, he revealed that he wouldn’t take on the role of Andrew Beckett, a gay man with AIDS, in his groundbreaking 1993 film “Philadelphia” if it were made today.

When questioned whether a heterosexual actor could portray the character now, Hanks responded with a firm “no, and rightly so.”

He elaborated by stating that the only reason he portrayed Beckett at the time was due to the prevailing fear surrounding a film centered on a gay man with AIDS, suggesting that casting a straight actor helped assuage those concerns.

If this indeed was the reason why Hanks accepted the role in the 1990s, he has not publicly discussed it until now.

During his Oscars acceptance speech in 1994, after winning Best Actor for “Philadelphia,” Hanks did not address what he now characterizes as the ‘inauthenticity of a straight actor playing a gay character.

‘ Instead, he tearfully acknowledged his gay drama teacher, who imparted the wisdom, ‘act well the part, there all the glory lies.’ Hanks also dedicated his speech to the thousands of gay men who had tragically lost their lives during the AIDS pandemic.

In today’s climate of identity politics, actors increasingly feel pressured to disavow their past roles. Hanks, in his interview with The New York Times, indicated that he wouldn’t take on the role of Forrest Gump if the film were made today, presumably due to concerns about Gump being portrayed as ‘mentally challenged.

‘ This shift may be influenced by recent controversies, such as the backlash against Maddie Ziegler’s portrayal of an autistic character in Sia’s film “Music.”

The argument that only individuals with specific ‘lived experiences’ can authentically depict certain characters is dismissive and shortsighted. Some of cinema’s most remarkable performances have arisen from actors challenging themselves to inhabit roles outside their usual realm.

“Brokeback Mountain,” which explores a love affair between two cowboys, garnered widespread acclaim and numerous awards in 2005. Neither of the film’s leads, Heath Ledger nor Jake Gyllenhaal, identified as gay.

Similarly, in 2014, Matthew McConaughey earned an Oscar, a Golden Globe, and a Screen Actors Guild Award for his portrayal of an AIDS patient in “Dallas Buyers Club,” while Jared Leto received an Oscar for his role as a HIV-positive transgender woman in the same film.

Ensuring authenticity in portraying a character and their background is crucial—Minnie Driver’s questionable Irish accent in the 1995 film “Circle of Friends” undermines the audience’s ability to suspend disbelief.

However, the essence of acting lies in convincing the audience that you are no longer yourself, but the character you’re portraying. Tom Hanks, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Matthew McConaughey may lack personal experience in certain roles, but their ability to immerse themselves in character is what defines their craft.

Hanks hasn’t faced calls to apologize for his role in “Splash,” where he romances a mermaid. Similarly, Frances McDormand’s portrayal in “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri” captivated audiences despite her lack of personal connection to the character’s experiences. Acting transcends personal background—it’s about embodying the essence of another person’s story.